<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/9VDvgL58h_Y&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/9VDvgL58h_Y&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>

http://www.nytimes.com/1998/05/10/us/nat...-twin.html

I used to think that when writers heard the word "twin", the part of their brain involving rational thought just shut down to give way to "we totally need to have an evil version of our character". I mean, I just couldn't imagine something like that having ANY basis in reality.

Then it got real.

Wow... Well score one for "nurture".

Seriously though, impersonating her twin and then trying to have her killed? It's like the list of serial plotlines a silver age comic tries to get away with as they try more and more idiotic things.

The next time we see this twin she'll have made some sort of evil pact with a ghost to gain phenominal cosmic power, and the twin's blood is the only thing that can sever the chain, or something.

Who actually heard his last words? This has been bugging me since I saw it. The greatest movie of all time has a big arse plot hole right from the start.

Well executed, great story, and yet there's this huge plot hole, at least I THINK so.

Please, could someone tell me if his room was wire tapped or if there was someone else in there, or outside with their ear to the door, or he left his phone off the hook, or something?

Since Ryan fixed the spoiler tags, I thought I should get off my ass and contribute some more.

So here it is, introducing action bubbles!
Inspired by the coolness that was chat city (a dialup bullition board that was the shit back in the day)

Only now that feature has 2010 coolness built right in.
Now in the TC editor tool bar! Just click

[ACTION]Runs and screams naked through the thread... [/ACTION]

Which was better?

<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/jKAUnXIPT0E&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/jKAUnXIPT0E&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>

Wow...

The early 90’s saw one of the biggest battles of console gaming history, between industry veteran Nintendo and young upstart Sega. After the stunning success of the NES, Nintendo was left with a decision to make with how to follow up on that success. Their idea became the SNES, a system more powerful and more versatile than its predecessor. It launched in November 1990 in Japan, August 1991 in the States, but was preceded by Sega’s Genesis console which launched in October 1988. And this time around Mario had stiff compeitition: Sonic the Hedgehog.

What followed was a might battle and Sega made inroads on Nintendo’s hardware base, but, in the end, it wasn’t enough and Nintendo left the battlefield as the ultimate victor. That’s what the history books say, but who REALLY won? In this multi-part series, the lineups of the two consoles will be dissected and picked apart as the truth float to the top and all the hyberpole and hype is filtered away.

Hardware power? Graphics? Sound quality? Controller? Catridge size? Doesn’t matter. This series will focus on the one thing that matters more than anything else: THE GAMES.

Coming up in Part 1: Action Games

http://greatrumbler.wordpress.com/2010/0...roduction/

http://www.jesusdressup.com/

Kick ass controversy