...does anyone wanna go to war with me...? I'm bored, and I haven't been to war with any of ya in so long... and my militar is decadating before my eyes. I can't have that---so, war-to-the-death, anyone? C'mon, please...
NEW YORK - Web surfing has belonged almost exclusively to Microsoft Corp.'s Internet Explorer ever since it buried Netscape's pioneering browser. That doesn't seem to have bothered the developers of the Mozilla Firefox, a feisty new kid on the block that's worth a serious look.
Photo
AP Photo
delayed 20 mins - disclaimer
Quote Data provided by Reuters
Get Media Savvy
New devices aim to tie your PC to home entertainment. You might even want to ditch your DVD player.
Officially released this week, Firefox packs security protections and other welcome features that emphasize just how little Microsoft has innovated its aging Microsoft browser in recent years.
True, Microsoft made significant security improvements to IE when it released Service Pack 2 for Windows XP (news - web sites) computers in August. But the improvements aren't available for older Windows systems. Nor does the updated IE offer a versatile search box, a pop-up blocker, feeds of frequently visited Web pages or the ability to open windows within windows. More on that later.
The biggest reason to consider Firefox is security.
To its credit, Microsoft is trying hard to address that. But as long as IE commands more than 90 percent of the world's computers, malicious hackers will continue to target it. The very IE features that Web developers love are also exploited by virus and spyware writers.
That's not to say you can't get spyware or other malicious code using Firefox, but risks are greatly reduced.
Firefox also offers protections against phishing — those e-mail scams that pretend to be legitimate notices from banks and service providers. A few scams did slip through during my test, but I was warned about others.
Still not sold? Then check out Firefox's non-security features, which are available on IE only by downloading third-party toolbars or plug-ins, some of which carry a fee:
_Search. From a toolbar up top, you have instant access to several search engines and can easily switch among them. You can also customize the browser so that typing "book" followed by a title automatically performs a search at amazon.com.
_Pop-up blocker. It does the job, while letting you open pop-ups you want.
_News feeds. Firefox supports Really Simple Syndication, or RSS, a technology for pulling headlines from news sites and Web journals so you won't have to keep checking them.
_Tabbed browsing. Instead of constantly opening new windows to browse, cluttering your Windows taskbar, Firefox lets you open new pages as tabs within a single window. Click on the appropriate tab to switch among the pages.
The latest version of Netscape, which shares much of Firefox's core technology, also has many of these features, and Norwegian browser Opera offers all four — and more.
But both bundle e-mail and other tools that can get in the way. When viewing a Web page on Opera, for instance, clicking on an e-mail link calls up Opera's own e-mail software — not Microsoft Outlook, which my company requires me to use.
And did I mention that Firefox is free? Opera costs $39 for an ad-free version.
Despite being a "1.0" release, Firefox is mature. And the breeding is good. It's the product of more than a thousand full-time engineers and volunteers and is based on the open-source Mozilla suite, which in turn has its roots in Netscape.
Plus, Firefox is available for Linux (news - web sites) and Mac computers as well. I tried the Mac version and found all the major features available right away.
The browser was also available in more than a dozen languages on its first day — a commendable feat.
Of course, no good product comes without a catch. I ran into trouble with a few Web sites designed specifically for IE, mainly those requiring ActiveX controls or the portion of JavaScript in which Microsoft departs from published standards.
So you can forget about watching movies on CinemaNow or Movielink. You also won't be able to update your Windows operating system relying on Firefox alone (Good thing Microsoft bundles IE with its operating systems).
Plug-ins designed for Netscape or Opera should work with Firefox, but you won't be able to use any of the IE toolbars, including Yahoo's spyware scanner and e-mail checker, or fully take advantage of Google's new desktop search software.
Nevertheless, some companies, including Amazon.com, are starting to adapt their tools for Firefox.
Some Web pages won't display correctly — among the ones I encountered were spam stats from Postini Inc., stock indices for the Bombay Stock Exchange and one AP internal site.
And Firefox mysteriously froze the first time I checked America Online mail. Closing the browser and restarting it fixed it on two different computers.
As for the RSS feeds, though I was impressed with how easy it was to add feeds for sites that let machines automatically detect them, manually adding feeds was overly complicated. I also found the tools for reading feeds quite clunky and inflexible. Opera has much better RSS tools.
In fact, I see little reason to switch from Opera, unless you'd prefer to drop the e-mail integration. The features are comparable.
As an alternative to IE, Firefox is a strong contender. And for the few sites that don't work with Firefox, you can always launch IE.
I havent gotten Firefox , But I have had Mozilla version 17.3 for about two weeks now. It runs alot faster smoother then MS IE, I have had virtually no spyware since I switched , Spysweeper use to detect a good 15-20 new ones a day on IE and I have seen almost none since I coverted to Mozilla.My surfing habaits havent changed at all I go to the same exact sites, Its simular to netscape since it was made by the same engineers but its incredibly simple it has so many things IE doesnt have , It has a download manager that keeps record and allows you to control whats being downloaded into your computer and even links you straight to were it is located on your computer afterwards if you miss place it. Now there wont be anymore "comet cursor or other bull shit surprises". If you go to alot of freaky sites this isnt a bad thing to have.
IE is a piece of shit , Microsoft haisnt really innovated it in years and it is the most cracked hacked targeted browswer around , Unlike IE it has a pop up and cookie manager and blocker.
I am promising you guys this: If I--no, when I become a professional game designer, I promise that I will do whatever I can to get permission from Bo Jackson to make an awesome game about him! Mark my words, you will live to see the day when Bo Jackson rules the video game kingdom! I already have a bunch of Bojacksome game ideas.
Quote:The massive programme of legal action against alleged infringers of a series of patents covering graphics and other computing techniques has been extended to console hardware vendors Sony, Microsoft and Nintendo.
The news follows yesterday's revelation that 18 PC hardware companies had also been targeted, alongside 12 games software publishers.
The console makers are accused of infringing two patents, 5,109,520 and 4,734,690. The latter essentially covers representing a dynamic 3D environment and objects on a 2D display, and is the same patent the games publishers have been alleged to have violated. The former is entitled 'Image frame buffer access speedup by providing multiple buffer controllers each containing command FIFO buffers', and is cited in the action against the PC makers.
In each case, the plaintiff is seeking a jury trial, and wants it the defendants to cough up legal costs, damages and both pre- and post-judgement interest on the damages.
With patent applications stretching right back to the mid-1980s, why has it taken so long for key hardware vendors and games software publishers to be sued for alleged infringement of a series of patents covering 3D graphics? Because the current owner of the intellectual property in question only took possession on 16 June 2004.
The current owner is one American Video Graphics, of Marshall, Texas. It's the company on whose behalf Dallas-based law firm McKool Smith - the name most associated with the current litigation - has filed complaints with the District Court for Eastern Texas against HP, Dell, IBM, Gateway, Acer, Sony, Toshiba, MPC, Systemax, Fujitsu, Micro Electronics, Matsushita, Averatec, Polywell, Twinhead, Sharp, Uniwill and JVC.
Games publishers on the receiving end of a writ include Electronic Arts, Take-Two, Activision, Atari, THQ, Vivendi Universal, Sega, Square Enix, Tecmo, Lucasarts, Namco and Ubisoft.
All these companies are charged with violating AVG's intellectual property rights by allegedly transgressing one or more of 25 separate patents originally filed by and granted to Tektronix. The patents were assigned between 1987 and 1992, and all were sold by Tektronix to a number of third-parties.
Patent number 4,734,690, for example, the patent the games publishers are alleged to have infringed, had two owners between Tektronix and AVG: David G White and Research Investment Network, inc. Others have longer ownership routes from the inventor to AVG.
The patents were sold by Tektronix at various points between 1999 and 2004. It's not clear whether any of the patents' previous owners pursued Sony, Nintendo, Microsoft and the others, but their swift sale suggests they were purchased for sale rather than exploitation.
AVG clearly feels differently and its mass-action suggests it believes it has a strong chance of success. Typically, IP owners pursuing large companies will chose one to fight and potentially make an example of in the hope of persuading others to sign up in the meantime and to limit their exposure should the action fail.
What a bunch of gold-diggers. Maybe they should try to actually make something rather than leeching off of everyone else.
![[Image: hw023500001.jpg]](http://www.planetgamecube.com/media/hw023500001.jpg)
![[Image: image_article2654_160x128.jpg]](http://www.theonion.com/images/410/image_article2654_160x128.jpg)
![[Image: DSC00120.jpg]](http://media.anime-cons.com/photos/otakon2003/DSC00120.jpg)
