Okay you should have a breakdown of this. Basically a "martial artist" with a whole dojo full of students he trains in mystical "chi" energy said he could beat any normally trained (as in, they defeat you using punches and kicks and stuff instead of chi) martial arts expert. Someone took him up on it, and well, the results speak for themselves. Note that beforehand you'll need to endure some painful pretend martial arts where all his students get flung around by his magic. Ah the power of delusion... Sure would have been nice if he could perhaps levitate someone or have done anything to them that isn't adequately explained by them just willingly dancing themselves.
Stuff like this is funny to me, but the sad fact is he'll make up excuses just like everyone who has to face such brutal reality about their super powers.
So IGN has this list up of hardest games. I'll give them most of the titles on that list as I've played the majority of them.
Then they go and put Megaman on there. Now, if they put any entry from the Zero series in there, or the later X games (like 5 on), I'd have their back. They put the FIRST one in there though.
Yes, it didn't have save points, but hard? Perhaps, but nothing nearly approaching the level of those other games. Megaman actually got EASIER from there for a while. The first X game was noted as being almost offensively easy in fact. Megaman is an interesting series mainly because in the current era, they seem to have substituted ridiculous difficulty for innovation. The current Megaman games are way harder than the old ones.
What should they have put in there? Well, I for one submit that Super Mario Bros the Lost Levels (Japan's SMB2) would be a great contender. That game was HARD.
Jeux-France as translated by Google Wrote:Sony Computer Entertainment organized as envisaged a launching at midnight of PlayStation 3 on a boat which accosted with the foot of the Eiffel Tower in Paris, with a thousand of machines available to the sale. The event unfortunately attracted only one score of people on the quay, and 4 to 5 people maximum on the other event organized simultaneously with Fnac of the Élysées Fields in Paris. One will note the unexpected presence and rather amusing of Microsoft come him also with his boat Xbox 360!
Although they haven't released the details yet , Some theorize that John Connor is going to have sex with Kyle Reese Mom ,Within time Kyle Reese will grow and be sent back in time to Shag Sarah Connor and in the process make John Connor his own self inbred Grand father.
I think T4 will follow the other films practice of aging Connor as the years go by , T1 Connor was a Zygote, T2 he was a young boy , T3 he was a young man, Albeit In T4 he will probably be older man which gives the possibility of a different actor then nick Stahl or Edward furlong. Who should be the older John Connor?
So I hear in the news, because this is apparently important, that Captain America is dead. Wow, that's a twist. Civil War and everything huh? Neato. Then, a few days ago, I hear that he's going to "get better" because people who actually read further in that comic say there's something about him recovering "in secret".
You see people, THIS is why no one takes comics seriously. They have these valuable intellectual properties and are totally convinced they can't make money without them (which may be true, but then again...) so they never actually kill any of these guys off! Even the bad guys are kept around, and they often just "let them go" at the end of some battle, even if the bad guy just KILLED A 3RD OF THE PLANET, because killing them "would make me no better than that guy", or some idiotic philosophy like that, and well philosophy is all well and good but you know that they are coming back to kill again and wouldn't you say it's wrong to allow those future deaths just to maintain some childish sense of super hero innocense? Look, either you grow up and don't worry about marketting, or you stop complaining when people say comic books can't be taken seriously as good narrative. Now, I've actually seen some interesting comics, some weird Japanese black and white affairs my friends have, which do something the big publishers would never consider doing. They END! They actually have an overarching plot that sees the characters wandering into the sunset and people actually die or retire FOREVER, major changes happen! Stuff! None of this eternal "lessons learned" then forgotten INSTANTLY as everything returns to the status quo.
You want to kill off a hero or villian? Do it, and don't bring them back! If you want to get me to ever actually read your comics, here's a thought. Try something NEW! Slowly retire your old heroes, one by one, as major changes happen, and bring brand new stuff into your worlds! I mean, HOW old is Batman at this point? Am I to believe this geriatric is still fighting crime? Bring in a new guy, like in Batman Beyond. They had a good idea there. In fact, go beyond THAT. I'm sick of the "universes" of heroes. Entire storylines that are so convoluted that they really can't do very much at all anyway. How about retiring the whole darned universe at some date in the future, and then creating brand new property after property, planning out a storyline, and retiring those in good time. I might see a constant supply of heroes going in and out on the shelves in stores, instead of "oh, look who's being dramatically wreslted to the ground by Superman this time".
What I'm saying is this. There's a reason no one cares about comic books. Kill off your old characters and start doing something new!
We have lots of technology to deal with the waste now that we didn't have before, including, for example, recycling the waste material into usable fuel again and transmuting the material into something safe. 3 mile island was safely contained. Chernobyl used methods no longer in use. Leaks aren't really a concern any more. I personally would have no problem with having one in my backyard, as they are run safely and more cleanly than coal plants. Further, the fuel is relatively plentiful and doesn't polute.
Why aren't we using nuclear power to solve our energy and polution problem? I mean it's not perfect, there's the cost of building it and it won't solve the problem of vehicle fuel needs, but it's a major step.
Fact is, there's environmentalism guided by science, and environmentalism guided by some love of the "earth mother" fueled by nothing but emotion. This whole problem with nuclear energy, at this point, can be relegated to hairy hippies who don't know what they are talking about.
What should Nintendo call it's next system? The Wii2 just won't do against something like a PS4. I'd go with Nintendo Go, I like the sound of it, but it's not trademarkable as much, I mean I don't think "Go" would be a trademarkable word. Maybe eGo, but e is so mid 1990's. i's are all the rage now, but it'll be faded in a few years (not to mention I have no idea what the "i" stands for in something like an iPod, internet? No, iPods don't surf the web, they play MUSIC). How about vGo? Nah, sounds like a 1950's sci fi plot device... uGo? PERFECT! Because it's, u, YOU! You have teh powers, feel EMPOWERED you slaves of our marketting hype!
It's like he just sends an update of his latest insane thoughts to all our favorite news sources.
Here's a gem.
Crazy Guy Wrote:Amen, and Praise be to God Almighty, maker of Heaven, Earth, and yes, the maker even video games.
Um... by this logic this god fellow must have created Manhunt and GTA as well. And you say you are fighting against it FOR god? Generally, an authority figure running around setting two subordinates against each other is generally a plot device in Star Trek, wherein Kirk says "don't you see, this is exactly what he wants!" and then later they destroy the overlord.
Well this little rant of his is just extra nuttiness.
