16th July 2003, 9:30 AM
I hope the moral structure I proposed does not get pidgeonholed into being about "harm," unless harm is to be defined as, "a breach of one's protected rights." Physical integrity is just one of those. So, for example, the right to own property is protected.
Here is a snippet from a Time interview with Ann Coulter:
If you're going to be literal about the constitution and say that the only right as citizens we have are those that are noted in the constitution, heterosexual people can't have sex either.
Here is a snippet from a Time interview with Ann Coulter:
Quote:Time: What's your take on the Supreme Court's ruling that antisodomy laws are unconstitutional?
Gay sex may well be a mystery of life, but I'll be damned if I can find it in the Constitution.
If you're going to be literal about the constitution and say that the only right as citizens we have are those that are noted in the constitution, heterosexual people can't have sex either.