18th June 2003, 6:05 PM
OoT has more enemies when you count all the variations of each enemy in the list.
I'm not sure which has a longer list when you don't. Might be WW.
But unlike Darunia, that isn't what I'm really concerned about... they are close. So there is no excuse for WW having such a awful repetition of enemies that OoT didnt. With the same number of enemies they could use just as much variety...
And no, its not all just "WW has more enemies". It does, true. But it doesn't just have larger groups -- some enemies just repeat far, far more (in groups or no)! And its annoying!
Oh, and its funny to watch OB1 try to deny that he lost this arguement a month ago... :D
I'm not sure which has a longer list when you don't. Might be WW.
But unlike Darunia, that isn't what I'm really concerned about... they are close. So there is no excuse for WW having such a awful repetition of enemies that OoT didnt. With the same number of enemies they could use just as much variety...
And no, its not all just "WW has more enemies". It does, true. But it doesn't just have larger groups -- some enemies just repeat far, far more (in groups or no)! And its annoying!
Oh, and its funny to watch OB1 try to deny that he lost this arguement a month ago... :D