13th January 2006, 8:59 AM
Multiple sources aren't proper evidence unless the sources themselves are valid.
The Enquirer is highly reputed though, that should be enough. Of course, if something seems off, if the data seems to have no source or there's some logical flaw or too many assumptions...
Basically I'm saying use good judgement and don't believe everything you read. Still, sounds like there's enough reason to at least check into things.
The Enquirer is highly reputed though, that should be enough. Of course, if something seems off, if the data seems to have no source or there's some logical flaw or too many assumptions...
Basically I'm saying use good judgement and don't believe everything you read. Still, sounds like there's enough reason to at least check into things.
"On two occasions, I have been asked [by members of Parliament], 'Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question." ~ Charles Babbage (1791-1871)