23rd February 2003, 3:45 PM
(This post was last modified: 23rd February 2003, 3:51 PM by Nintendarse.)
I know it's my fault that I can't properly communicate my idea, but you're not making it easier for me with your sarcasm.
The line of logic goes like this:
Innovation is subjective (which, in Physics terms, is "relative")
We must choose a reference frame (like in physics)
The reference frame should be the consumer
From th reference frame of the consumer, Zelda is not innovative
Therefore, for all intents and purposes, Zelda is not innovative.
Please don't mock me. I'm trying here, but clearly I'm struggling with th idea as well.
The line of logic goes like this:
Innovation is subjective (which, in Physics terms, is "relative")
We must choose a reference frame (like in physics)
The reference frame should be the consumer
From th reference frame of the consumer, Zelda is not innovative
Therefore, for all intents and purposes, Zelda is not innovative.
Please don't mock me. I'm trying here, but clearly I'm struggling with th idea as well.