23rd February 2003, 2:45 PM
Obviously, you've stopped listening to my arguments (or at least processing them), and right about now, I'm about to do the same thing...counting backwards from 10...9...8...7...6...5...4...3...2...1
Okay.
Calm.
Let's do this one point at a time:
Innovation
Resolved: Is Wind Waker Innovative?
As I understand, you are arguing that, yes, Wind Waker is innovative.
I am arguing essentially the opposite. My argument is based on my observation that innovation is not an absolute quantity (42, for example, is an absolute quantity). Like "fun," innovation is subjective.
Please, make your point. Then I will make mine.
Okay.
Calm.
Let's do this one point at a time:
Innovation
Resolved: Is Wind Waker Innovative?
As I understand, you are arguing that, yes, Wind Waker is innovative.
I am arguing essentially the opposite. My argument is based on my observation that innovation is not an absolute quantity (42, for example, is an absolute quantity). Like "fun," innovation is subjective.
Please, make your point. Then I will make mine.