22nd May 2005, 1:14 AM
OB1 Wrote:Please, just because you read Steven King books doesn't make you any sort of authority on good storytelling.
It helps. He's more of a storyteller than Lucas could ever hope to be.
Quote:Long and convoluted backstories are most certainly not needed to make for interesting characters in a story. You don't need to know what Palpatine eats for breakfast and how he spent his childhood summers. And lust for power, the urge to make things right in your point of view by having absolute control, is the very motive of just about every single major "villain" in history. Call it cliche if you want--that is realism.
1. I fail to see why you think there are either only long, convoluted backstories, or none whatsoever. It doesn't have to be long or complex. But it does need to exist. Some effort has to be made.
2. You are so wrong about that second point it's not even funny. That you think so proves just how little experience you have in characterization. Beleive it or not, sometimes things can be driven by purely personal motives too.
Quote:What makes a good character is defining characteristics. That is the most important thing. Everything in addition to that helps but isn't necessary. You can have a great character even if you know nothing about his/her past and only understand them in the present tense, and likewise you can have a great character if you understand every single thing there is to know about them. But the true testament to their quality is that first thing I mentioned, their defining characteristics. Everything else helps but isn't nearly as important as you suggest. To you the most important thing is the background. Who cares if the character is interesting without that information or not. People still remember Han Solo, and why is that? Most people don't know a thing about his past. Yet he's endured for 30 years. Han Solo might be better appreciated by knowing more about his past, but without those defining characteristics none of that matters.
Han Solo isn't deep either. He has some basic motivation, moreso than Palpatine, but he's nowhere near Shakespearean either. Defining characteristics are trite. How many characters out there share the same character as Han Solo? He's a walking cliche himself, a badass space cowboy who ogles chicks and yells YAHOO a lot. He doesn't develop much throught the series. In fact, pretty much every Star Wars character except Vader begins and ends in a mostly-cliched role. These characters endure because expectations among the fanbase are suitably-low, and they sell a lot of licensed merchandise. None of the characters are great, or even that good. They are merely suitable for the roles they play.
YOU CANNOT HIDE FOREVER
WE STAND AT THE DOOR
WE STAND AT THE DOOR