27th January 2003, 2:23 PM
Quote:Originally posted by Laser Link
Great, wasn't it? :D
But to be fair, there was no way the Raider's first TD should have counted. The original ruling was that he was out of bounds, and the replays contradicted themselves. One looked like he dragged his foot, the other showed his foot was in the air. That is not anywhere close to "indusputable video evidence" and never should have been everturned. I've seen plenty of calls that should have been overturned, but the ref couldn't see 100% evidence of it and kept the original ruling. This was a pity call, but almost turned the game around.
Actually it should have been no touchdown because either indisputable evidence OR he did not have control of the ball. The ref focused on his feet, and didnt even MENTION his hands. He was bobbling the ball all the way till he stepped out of bounds.
<IMG SRC="http://www.devilknights.34sp.com/-___-.jpg" border=0>