19th April 2006, 1:14 PM
Command & Conquer 3
19th April 2006, 2:27 PM
The only C&C game I own is Red Alert 2 (with its expansion), and they're good, but the C&C style of very fast paced, rush-heavy gameplay just isn't as fun as Blizzard's perfect balance of speed and strategy...
19th April 2006, 3:53 PM
Command and Conquer: Generals was quite fun.
Sometimes you get the scorpion.
20th April 2006, 9:25 AM
Huh, so it seems like it's going to be Tiberian Twilight... interesting...
C&C1 being Tiberian Dawn, C&C2 being Tiberian Sun, C&C3 being Tiberan Twilight. The serious C&C series. Red Alert 1/2 is the humor series (the story in RA2 was great... a showcase game for why 2d is still a perfectly fine option for game design and for why FMV can be good when it's done well...). Generals? I don't know where that game fits...
20th April 2006, 12:04 PM
http://www.gaming-age.com/cgi-bin/previe...c&game=cc3
Actual title is Tiberium Wars, but it should be Tiberian/Tiberium Twilight. :) To fit with the first two and because years back they said that that would be the third C&C game's name, I think... though I'd have to go back to my PC Gamer archives to be sure...
25th April 2006, 8:56 PM
Tiberian Twilight sounds a lot better.
25th April 2006, 9:42 PM
Yes, it definitely does. But should we actually expect EALA to follow up on what Westwood said they would do with the series five or six years ago? Yeah right...
Who wants to bet that this somehow ISN'T the end of the series, as Twilight was supposed to be if I remember things correctly? Command & Conquer: Tiberium Dawn Command & Conquer: Tiberian Sun Command & Conquer: Tiberium ... Wars? Huh? ... okay, the first game's box just says 'Command & Conquer', but 'Tiberium Dawn' was the subtitle stated somewhere or other... Also, the expansions follow no naming pattern (Covert Operations for the first game, Firestorm for the second), but that's pretty much irrelevant.
26th April 2006, 1:29 AM
It's EA. We'll be lucky if the game isn't shit on a disc.
|
|