26th February 2003, 8:35 PM
Quote:*sigh*
It's a never-ending line of repetition with you, ABF. I used to have the game, and I'm well aware of those things that you have stated. But I still consider DK GB to be a an extended port of the original DK game. And as I said before, you can think differently if you want to.
You really do have a problem with people thinking differently than you, don't you? You poor, petty boy.
But the game has so little in common with DK-arcade that I just can't see how you can possibly call it any kind of an add-on... or even a sequel, since usually sequels have gameplay like the original game in a series...
Quote:You also said that MMX was a HUGE change in the series. I started playing them when MM1 came out, which was when I was four. I still like the games, but I hate it how Capcom just recycles them over and over.
Considering how little Mega Man games change, it certainly was a major change.
Quote:Legends was crap, but it doesn't mean that change has to be bad. Look at the Castlevania series as an example. Konami always changed things with the series (the second game was quite different from the first one, for example), even if it was just a simple matter of stealing ideas from other games (like Super Metroid). But if there's any game worth stealing ideas from, Super Metroid is it. There have been three Super Metroid-like Castlevania games so far (soon to be four), and Konami plans on changing the series again with the upcoming PS2 installment. I am positive that Capcom could change Mega Man for the better. They just have to try harder. Hell just copy Jet Force Gemini and I'll be happy. I'm sick of the repetition.
Mega Man Zero on GBC made some pretty big changes... more than any Mega Man game in a REALLY long time. No choice of bosses, no Mega Man, those 'cyber elf' powerups, having both a gun and sword, etc... have you played that one?
And I know I'm repeating myself, but I like it the way it is too... :)
Quote:That doesn't make any sense. It has nothing to do with what I was talking about. First you say that I have bad taste in games, then I say that you have bad taste in games, then you say that it's all subjective, then I say that I know that and was trying to get you to admit it, then you say that you knew that and were also playing along, and then you say that I have bad taste in games again.
Nice sentence, huh? You're a never-ending contradiction, ABF.
None of that would have happened if you'd just understood what I meant in the beginning... but like usual you didn't...
It would be subjective if you disliked certain games. But disliking pretty much everything goes beyond that. Simple enough?