27th February 2003, 1:15 PM
Quote:What the hell? What are you replying to? I just said "ookay".
Your comments about the game needing more firing directions of course... what else?
Quote:It was very bad by Mario standards. It's the slow little cousin that never gets invited to family dinners.
No Mario game remotely deserves being called "very bad". Not even close.
Quote:The Gameboy was Nintendo's little money maker that they didn't need to put many recources into because it would sell like crack no matter what. That's why in nine years we only got one Zelda game, one Metroid game, and one good Mario game (Mario Land 2). Third-party games were complete shit for the most part. It's lineup was filled with more stinkers than the PSX could have ever dreamed of. When the GBC came out Nintendo and third-parties were able to port over some very good NES games, and Nintendo let Capcom make two Zelda games. Hoo-ah! That's what I'm talking about! And while the GBC may not have as many good games as the Gameboy, it certainly does have more great games.
Not as badly as Nintendo is abusing the GBA... I mean, at least on the GB their games were ORIGINAL! Almost all their GBA games are SNES ports... good SNES ports, but SNES ports all the same. Same with GBC and the NES ports... true, it didn't have as many good (or great) games as a console around for 9 years should have... but it did have a lot of them, and far more than the GBC. The GBC had fewer games period... so fewer good ones and fewer great ones.
Oh, and if you want to know Nintendo's weakest system, only a insane person wouldn't say the Virtual Boy.