8th April 2006, 12:51 PM
it's weird, but it looks HD, it also looks better than the Unreal 3 engine (which supports HD). Those screens sure do look awfully sharp, i mean is it just me or does this look better than any of the PS3 FPS stuff that's been shown (Unreal 3) or any of the FPS's on 360? All i can think of is GRAW for 360 and Red Steel definitely looks better than that which makes me think that these pics are somehow doctored or were taken off a dev kit running at higher resolutions than 720p I mean, if rev games look like this, MS and Sony look comparatively.... dumb. Like almost sad and might have pity for them if I didn't actually hate them. :D
super-tech systems that are difficult to program for, losinng money on that cost upwards of 400 bucks, rumored to 600 (costing the actual company 900 bucks a unit), 30 million dollar development costs, 60, 70 dollar games.... and then Nintendo shows up with the cheapest, easiest to develop for little system with graphics that compare to PS3 and 360. It's like having a biggest dick contest and right before the awards are given out for bigest dick, King Kong shows up and wrecks the grading curve.
3 weeks away...... just 3 weeks......
super-tech systems that are difficult to program for, losinng money on that cost upwards of 400 bucks, rumored to 600 (costing the actual company 900 bucks a unit), 30 million dollar development costs, 60, 70 dollar games.... and then Nintendo shows up with the cheapest, easiest to develop for little system with graphics that compare to PS3 and 360. It's like having a biggest dick contest and right before the awards are given out for bigest dick, King Kong shows up and wrecks the grading curve.
3 weeks away...... just 3 weeks......