25th January 2006, 1:48 PM
I do notice the image line up method doesn't account for rotational movement of the camera, as there is still a little jittering, but yeah, it's pretty clear here there's no reason to think that is actually a creature. Not evidence that it isn't bigfoot really, who's to say they don't walk like us? However, what's more important is it shows that the evidence some of the footies use to show it can't be human (look at how he walks) has no basis in reality. There's just no reason to believe he exists, which is reason enough to default to not believing in it until proper evidence is presented.
In conclusion, SHOW ME A BAG OF BIG FOOT'S DROPPINGS OR SHUT UP!
Big foot lover: I have a bag of the droppings of someone who says he SAW Big Foot!
DJ: Shut up!
In conclusion, SHOW ME A BAG OF BIG FOOT'S DROPPINGS OR SHUT UP!
Big foot lover: I have a bag of the droppings of someone who says he SAW Big Foot!
DJ: Shut up!
"On two occasions, I have been asked [by members of Parliament], 'Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question." ~ Charles Babbage (1791-1871)