24th June 2005, 9:22 PM
Now that I didn't know. I only got a brief description of a few things he said on the news.
But if he's a scientologist, that's "enough" for the most part. The fact is, people are going to listen to this guy because he's famous. That insane cult seems to be spreading just a little too much. They haven't become militant, a good move on their part as far as their continued survival goes, but yeesh... Has this guy ever actually tried to find any of these super powered people that insane religion says are out there proving it right?
And oh yes, I've mentioned it before but it's odd how they actually call it scientology, as though it's actually based on science. Did I say odd? I meant "specifically engineered to get a certain response".
Thanks to their lovely policy that says if you tell anyone higher tenets of the faith their head will explode (that's only a slight exxageration, they pretty much do say just that), basically the average person who (justifiably) doesn't look into that garbage, seems a lot of people see that whole cult as a legitimate harmless religion.
Oh well... All things considered, I'll just ignore the guy. It's a shame the crazies are starting to use a word that skeptics invented though!
asm, once again I had to skim past your post due to the lack of things like proper punctuation. I'm sure you have a lot of good points, but you need to convey them in a way that isn't painful to read.
But if he's a scientologist, that's "enough" for the most part. The fact is, people are going to listen to this guy because he's famous. That insane cult seems to be spreading just a little too much. They haven't become militant, a good move on their part as far as their continued survival goes, but yeesh... Has this guy ever actually tried to find any of these super powered people that insane religion says are out there proving it right?
And oh yes, I've mentioned it before but it's odd how they actually call it scientology, as though it's actually based on science. Did I say odd? I meant "specifically engineered to get a certain response".
Thanks to their lovely policy that says if you tell anyone higher tenets of the faith their head will explode (that's only a slight exxageration, they pretty much do say just that), basically the average person who (justifiably) doesn't look into that garbage, seems a lot of people see that whole cult as a legitimate harmless religion.
Oh well... All things considered, I'll just ignore the guy. It's a shame the crazies are starting to use a word that skeptics invented though!
asm, once again I had to skim past your post due to the lack of things like proper punctuation. I'm sure you have a lot of good points, but you need to convey them in a way that isn't painful to read.
"On two occasions, I have been asked [by members of Parliament], 'Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question." ~ Charles Babbage (1791-1871)