13th May 2005, 4:26 PM
The whole post, OB1. In the third post you said
and that started
the 'misunderstading' part probably refers to this part.
Seriously, how more on topic could DJ have been? Just ignore those ten posts of garbage and it makes perfect sense. He just needs to use quotes.
Quote:It looks great for this gen, but crap for next. Can't even touch Unreal 3 tech.
and that started
Quote:Incidently, Silicon Knights has the exclusive rights to makes games based on the Unreal 3 engine.
Quote:Yeah.
Quote:Yeah, that looks great for this gen, but next-gen? I'd expect more...
As for SK and the Unreal 3 engine, I heard about that, interesting... I wonder if that says anything about what their next game will be...
Quote:Maybe we'll see some games based on it before the end of the decade.
Quote:All it says is that it should look purdy. Every game company and their uncle is using unreal 3 tech for next-gen.
the 'misunderstading' part probably refers to this part.
Quote:The next generation of FPSes are mostly going to be powered by it or Doom 3, so I'm sure we will.
Quote:What about Quake 4?
Quote:Doom 3.
Quote:Okay.
Quote:That's a bit of a misunderstanding. The engines for various 3D computer games, mostly FPS games, but some adventure games too, did in fact use the same original game's engine, but not all, not by a long shot. And no, I don't mean the ones that looked aweful. I mean the ones that actually looked just as good but used a unique engine, simply so they had control over it. Nintendo won't be using the new unreal engine for sure, though games will likely look just as good as it, or better.
Seriously, how more on topic could DJ have been? Just ignore those ten posts of garbage and it makes perfect sense. He just needs to use quotes.