23rd February 2003, 8:48 PM
Quote:But none have created a truley believable, interactive cartoon.
I'd put that pretty definitely in the realm of opinion... given that a lot of games have done cartoonish stuff... I don't know which offhand, but I'm sure something has done that before... its not like Nintendo invented the idea of doing a game in a cartoonish style, after all...
Quote:You're just mad that you're always so wrong and can never effectively prove your points.
In your dreams...
Quote:Isn't that what everybody wants? Don't you want Nintendo to offer online play with their games so that you can play against (and get beaten by) other people across the globe?
Uhh...

Quote: Naturally OoT is more of an innovation than WW is since it was the first 3-D Zelda game. But WW managed to create a fully interactive cartoon, and that's not just a cosmetic change. Like Miyamoto has clearly explained in the past, the new visual style gave the dev team more freedom with the gameplay, and I'm sure you'll know what he's talking about once you get the game.
We will see after its released... but I very highly doubt that its truly innovative. Different from usual? Of course... but innovative? Only if innovation involves doing stuff other people have done, but (in some ways at least) better... and I don't think it does.
Quote:Well that's your problem then. You don't have to like the visual style, that's perfectly fine. I myself can't stand the art in most PC RPGs (hello?? There are other things to draw inspiration from other than D&D) and that lame-ass Gauntlet franchise that you love so much (*shudder*). Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Just don't call the visual style "wrong" since the man behind the change is the same person that created the friggin' franchise.
:hammer: D&D is cool. You can never have too many D&D inspired games... as long as they're good, like they are...
Oh, and my opinion is right and yours is wrong. As usual... :) ...
In my opinion its wrong... thats the best way I can easily describe it...