11th September 2003, 11:48 AM
"somewhat"?? In most cases you lose over half of the entire picture!
I think you're in need of this little article: http://www.starwars.com/episode-ii/featu...dexp2.html
Here are some great comparison shots to show how just how much picture you lose with fullscreen:
![[Image: 69787_bg.jpg]](http://www.starwars.com/episode-ii/feature/20020925/img/69787_bg.jpg)
![[Image: 66535_bg.jpg]](http://www.starwars.com/episode-ii/feature/20020925/img/66535_bg.jpg)
The different is enourmous. Half of Yoda is cut off and you can't even see Mace in that second shot.
If you're a more casual movie-goer and really don't like movies all that much, then sure you're probably not going to care a whole lot. But for those of us who really like movies and want to watch them in the way they were meant to be seen, pan & scan is verrry bad.
I think you're in need of this little article: http://www.starwars.com/episode-ii/featu...dexp2.html
Here are some great comparison shots to show how just how much picture you lose with fullscreen:
![[Image: 69787_bg.jpg]](http://www.starwars.com/episode-ii/feature/20020925/img/69787_bg.jpg)
![[Image: 66535_bg.jpg]](http://www.starwars.com/episode-ii/feature/20020925/img/66535_bg.jpg)
The different is enourmous. Half of Yoda is cut off and you can't even see Mace in that second shot.
If you're a more casual movie-goer and really don't like movies all that much, then sure you're probably not going to care a whole lot. But for those of us who really like movies and want to watch them in the way they were meant to be seen, pan & scan is verrry bad.