• Login
  • Register
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:
  • Home
  • Members
  • Team
  • Help
User Links
  • Login
  • Register
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:

    Quick Links Home Members Team Help
    Tendo City Tendo City: Metropolitan District Den of the Philociraptor Lawrence v. Texas: Discuss

     
    • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
    Lawrence v. Texas: Discuss
    A Black Falcon
    Offline

    Administrator

    Posts: 30,479
    Threads: 1,353
    Joined: 12-19-1999
    #20
    4th July 2003, 7:29 PM
    Quote:Also, a boss can't discriminate against a gay person if they don't know he or she is gay.


    It is perfectly legal in the US to fire people, evict them from apartments, or do anything else along that line to someone because they are gay. Sexuality is NOT in the list of things which are llegal to fire people for (religion, race, gender, etc), quite unfortunately...

    Quote:Society does determine what is right and what is wrong. That is the very basis of law. If morality were determined solely by the individual, then essentially anything could be moral, and anyone could justify anything simply by claiming their personal morality. There are inherent problems with that. Perhaps you have heard of NAMBLA? That is essentially the claim they make: What they do (promoting gay sex between children and adults) is moral because they don't think there's anything wrong with it. Yet, society disagrees, with good reason.


    Yeah, morals in a society are made by the people in that society.

    For example, in ancient Greece man-boy love wasn't just accepted, it was a major part of their culture... and somehow I think they were somewhat successful?

    Quote:If you want to see where moral relativism takes place, you need only look at whatever lawless third-world nation you choose... Africa's got quite a few. Everyone has their own morals because there is no society, and because of that the strong can and do impose their morals over the weak, because who will stop them? In contrast, civilized nations of the world, for the most part, practice social morality in some fashion, and as a result, have a much stronger and rich society. Moral relativism is something that should only exist where there is no society. To want to dismantle social morality and artificially create a moral vacuum is, as you put it, absolutely ridiculous. It is such an atmosphere where immorality such as gay marriage can be forced on a society that does not approve of it.


    You are confusing moral relativism with lack of state security or functioning government. Crucial difference there.
    My Games Collection (Always Updated) My Webpage!
    Currently Playing: Various Stuff
    [Image: logo_bos_79x76.jpg]
    Reply
    Reply
    « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

    Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



    Messages In This Thread
    Lawrence v. Texas: Discuss - by Nintendarse - 3rd July 2003, 6:45 AM
    Lawrence v. Texas: Discuss - by Weltall - 3rd July 2003, 8:17 AM
    Lawrence v. Texas: Discuss - by Sacred Jellybean - 3rd July 2003, 11:22 AM
    Lawrence v. Texas: Discuss - by OB1 - 3rd July 2003, 12:50 PM
    Lawrence v. Texas: Discuss - by EdenMaster - 3rd July 2003, 2:09 PM
    Lawrence v. Texas: Discuss - by Dark Lord Neo - 3rd July 2003, 3:09 PM
    Lawrence v. Texas: Discuss - by A Black Falcon - 3rd July 2003, 6:31 PM
    Lawrence v. Texas: Discuss - by Weltall - 3rd July 2003, 8:44 PM
    Lawrence v. Texas: Discuss - by A Black Falcon - 3rd July 2003, 9:14 PM
    Lawrence v. Texas: Discuss - by Weltall - 3rd July 2003, 9:33 PM
    Lawrence v. Texas: Discuss - by A Black Falcon - 3rd July 2003, 10:10 PM
    Lawrence v. Texas: Discuss - by Weltall - 3rd July 2003, 10:39 PM
    Lawrence v. Texas: Discuss - by Geno - 4th July 2003, 7:43 AM
    Lawrence v. Texas: Discuss - by A Black Falcon - 4th July 2003, 7:29 PM
    Lawrence v. Texas: Discuss - by Weltall - 4th July 2003, 7:51 PM
    Lawrence v. Texas: Discuss - by A Black Falcon - 4th July 2003, 8:00 PM
    Lawrence v. Texas: Discuss - by Weltall - 4th July 2003, 8:14 PM
    Lawrence v. Texas: Discuss - by A Black Falcon - 4th July 2003, 8:40 PM
    Lawrence v. Texas: Discuss - by Weltall - 5th July 2003, 2:21 AM
    Lawrence v. Texas: Discuss - by alien space marine - 7th July 2003, 5:15 AM
    Lawrence v. Texas: Discuss - by Dark Lord Neo - 7th July 2003, 9:00 AM
    Lawrence v. Texas: Discuss - by alien space marine - 7th July 2003, 11:11 AM
    Lawrence v. Texas: Discuss - by Weltall - 7th July 2003, 11:38 AM
    Lawrence v. Texas: Discuss - by Dark Lord Neo - 7th July 2003, 11:54 AM
    Lawrence v. Texas: Discuss - by Weltall - 7th July 2003, 1:29 PM
    Lawrence v. Texas: Discuss - by alien space marine - 7th July 2003, 5:00 PM
    Lawrence v. Texas: Discuss - by Dark Lord Neo - 7th July 2003, 9:44 PM
    Lawrence v. Texas: Discuss - by Weltall - 8th July 2003, 1:45 AM
    Lawrence v. Texas: Discuss - by alien space marine - 8th July 2003, 4:03 AM
    Lawrence v. Texas: Discuss - by Dark Jaguar - 8th July 2003, 8:48 AM
    Lawrence v. Texas: Discuss - by alien space marine - 8th July 2003, 1:10 PM
    Lawrence v. Texas: Discuss - by Nintendarse - 10th July 2003, 5:01 AM
    Lawrence v. Texas: Discuss - by A Black Falcon - 13th July 2003, 6:36 PM
    Lawrence v. Texas: Discuss - by alien space marine - 14th July 2003, 5:28 AM
    Lawrence v. Texas: Discuss - by Nintendarse - 16th July 2003, 7:22 AM
    Lawrence v. Texas: Discuss - by A Black Falcon - 16th July 2003, 8:29 AM
    Lawrence v. Texas: Discuss - by Nintendarse - 16th July 2003, 9:30 AM
    Lawrence v. Texas: Discuss - by A Black Falcon - 16th July 2003, 10:01 AM
    Lawrence v. Texas: Discuss - by Dark Jaguar - 16th July 2003, 10:20 AM
    Lawrence v. Texas: Discuss - by A Black Falcon - 16th July 2003, 10:44 AM
    Lawrence v. Texas: Discuss - by Nintendarse - 17th July 2003, 3:26 AM
    Lawrence v. Texas: Discuss - by OB1 - 4th July 2003, 10:11 AM
    Lawrence v. Texas: Discuss - by Nintendarse - 4th July 2003, 10:36 AM
    Lawrence v. Texas: Discuss - by Weltall - 4th July 2003, 12:14 PM
    Lawrence v. Texas: Discuss - by Weltall - 4th July 2003, 12:14 PM
    Lawrence v. Texas: Discuss - by Dark Lord Neo - 4th July 2003, 1:20 PM
    Lawrence v. Texas: Discuss - by Weltall - 4th July 2003, 2:23 PM

    • View a Printable Version
    • Subscribe to this thread
    Forum Jump:

    Toven Solutions

    Home · Members · Team · Help · Contact

    408 Chapman St. Salem, Viriginia

    +1 540 4276896

    etoven@gmail.com

    About the company Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

    Linear Mode
    Threaded Mode