18th June 2003, 8:30 PM
Quote:What...the FUCK are...you talking about...? OoT has more types, Moiraine & I both got lists to prove it way back when this first began. You provided a smaller WW list. It was obvious...you're just...either mistaken, or lying out your ass.
But of course, Darunia. Whatever you say. And that list Moiraine listed was filled with several mistakes. She even listed a bunch of enemies twice. Seriously!
Quote:Maybe you are, "dummy", but I'm not.
*clap clap clap clap clap* Well said!
Quote:...now thats just a downright lie. The argument was about which had more varieties of enemy...I remember because when it first came out, my arguments were: crappy ending, repitition of Moblins, and lack of types of enemy. You countered everyone of those, including the types of enemy...saying that WW had more than OoT. Moiraine will remember, too; we both provided lists, and you did too, and EVERYONE agreed that OoT had MORE....it was NOT about variety, you recently added that.
I might have originally said that, but the real debate was about which game had the greater variety of enemies. That is what you complained about, and you lost that debate.
Quote:I can't find that thread, and do you really think you're smarter than anyone else everything you (ROLL YOUR EYES) and (SAY 'UMMM...) ...? You must suffer from an inferiority complex to be so blatantly arrogant.
Because I like to use smilies?


:wave:
Quote:There's some possibility that you're correct, but we do count enemy variations; and even if we didnt, OoT would still have WW beat by some margin.
Nope, nope and uh... one more nope for good measure.
Wow, this arguing technique that you and ABf use so often is really great! I don't even have to follow up on my nopes!