The "I GOT WIND WAKER!!!" thread

[Darunia]

You just said that the debate was about which game has more enemy types, and you lost that debate. I provided proof that you are wrong, and you did nothing but say "nope!".

What...the FUCK are...you talking about...? OoT has more types, Moiraine & I both got lists to prove it way back when this first began. You provided a smaller WW list. It was obvious...you're just...either mistaken, or lying out your ass.

We're talking about variations on the same types of enemies, dummy. Like Fire Keese, Ice Keese, Poison Keese, etc.

Maybe you are, "dummy", but I'm not.

It has a few more total enemies than WW does, but that wasn't what the argument was about. It was about which one had the greatest variety of them.

...now thats just a downright lie. The argument was about which had more varieties of enemy...I remember because when it first came out, my arguments were: crappy ending, repitition of Moblins, and lack of types of enemy. You countered everyone of those, including the types of enemy...saying that WW had more than OoT. Moiraine will remember, too; we both provided lists, and you did too, and EVERYONE agreed that OoT had MORE....it was NOT about variety, you recently added that.

Um... you do know that this topic is about two months old and was already covered in your Wind Waker thread, right? Go read through that whole thing and you'll find what you're looking for.

I can't find that thread, and do you really think you're smarter than anyone else everything you (ROLL YOUR EYES) and (SAY 'UMMM...) ...? You must suffer from an inferiority complex to be so blatantly arrogant.

If you don't count the bosses in both games and take away all of the enemy variations, both games have about the same number of enemies. And the list I posted was actually missing some enemies.

There's some possibility that you're correct, but we do count enemy variations; and even if we didnt, OoT would still have WW beat by some margin.