The "I GOT WIND WAKER!!!" thread

[Darunia]

Wow, so is this how to try to win arguments? By completely changing the details of what the argument is about? Real good move, Darunia.

Beats me, buddy, thats how you do it. Our argument was over which game had more types of enemy; just which had more basic types. You then bet on the wrong horse and lost, so you said "oh, well, uh, it doesn't have DOZENS more, and that was the REAL argument all along!"

The argument had two sides to it. One, that OoT has dozens of more enemies than WW, and two, that OoT has a greater variety of enemies. Seven different flavors of the same enemy is not "lots of variety"

...we're not talking ice cream here...how many separate, respectable varieties of an enemy can you POSSIBLY have in a game...? Basically, only as many as you can make up elements for...water, earth, fire, ice, shadow, light, air-bound...running out yet?

The reason why OoT has a few more enemies than WW is because they made more "flavors" of enemies than WW.

Does it matter WHY OoT had more, the fact is, and you once more admitted, that it has MORE!!

If you were to only count the "raw" enemies as ABF put it, the games would have just about the same exact number of enemies, with WW possibly pulling up in the lead.

Okay, professor meatwad, why don't you use your fabled magic research and show us this "raw" bullshit you're trying to shove down our throats.

You lost, Darunia. Give it up.


*ROLLS EYES TO THE 10TH POWER*


Because I did the damn research!!

Ooooh, such strong emphasis on research, it must be true...just let me put on my glasses, and flip through this folder here of....your submitted....resear.....no, I'm sorry, there's nothing here but a bloated list of WW baddies, of which you yourself admittedly said was elongated when you admitted that the final boss is only one. Do you also count the chus separately?