6th July 2006, 2:33 PM
Wow, that guy actually refered to himself, the guy WRITING the entry for Henry there... That's bad form. It's like people have little understanding of writing a scientific or technical document. Story has no place, and "I believe" is hardly an accurate source of information. I believe there is an invisible dragon in Henry's nonexistant garage.
At any rate, list the changes you made as well as the evidence backing up what you say here. If it won't stick there, I'd at least be interested in it.
Wikipedia has always been a "work in progress", but that's the case for ALL HUMAN KNOWLEDGE. I'm shocked it works as well as it has though.
By the way, though the warning flag hasn't been put up yet, the "talk" page has one single comment, basically stating the same thing I did "it's all just personal takes by the author without any sourcing".
At any rate, list the changes you made as well as the evidence backing up what you say here. If it won't stick there, I'd at least be interested in it.
Wikipedia has always been a "work in progress", but that's the case for ALL HUMAN KNOWLEDGE. I'm shocked it works as well as it has though.
By the way, though the warning flag hasn't been put up yet, the "talk" page has one single comment, basically stating the same thing I did "it's all just personal takes by the author without any sourcing".
"On two occasions, I have been asked [by members of Parliament], 'Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question." ~ Charles Babbage (1791-1871)