Wow, this blows Power Thirst out of the water. They should put a special sound chip in the can so when you tilt it, it does the "filling energy meter" sound from the NES games.
Nintendo DSi
- 3.25 inch screens (DS = 3 inch)
- Has an inside and outside camera, 0.3 megapixels
- Has SD slot on right-hand side.
- Has onboard memory
- Comes with web browser
- Comes with app to detect some DS hotspots
- Has Apps store like iPod
- Apps are free/300/500/800 points
- Other apps include an app that allows you to make flipbooks using the cameras
- No GBA slot
- 18900 yen
- 1000 points for free if you buy before march 2010
- Possibly minorly upped resolution
- November in Japan, 2009 elsewhere.
- Black and white versions.
New Software:
- DS Pedometer, Miis on DS
- Mario and Luigi 3
- 3d Picross
- Let's Tap by Prope.
Wii:
- storage solution involves making SD card easier, coming in spring 2009
- you get 500 points if you help a friend set up their wii online
- wii comes with video explaining wii online functions
Wii Software:
- Punch-Out Wii
- Trace Memory Wii
- Sin and Punishment 2
- Sengoku Musou (Samurai Warriors) coming to Wii.
- Animal Crossing Wii interacts with AC DS
- New mainline Tales of.
- Wii getting re-releases of GCN titles. Not ports. Not ports. Not ports. Not ports. Do not appear to have waggle or any changes. Not ports. Re-releases. Should be budget. Starting with DK Jungle Beat and Pikmin.
This information is probably accurate, but we'll see for sure.
And so I go to download a completely classic from start to finish game.
...63 Megabytes?! What's this garglemess? It should have been more like 128 kilobits, tops! How the heck does this game take up that much space? It's true, people don't know how to space save like they used to.
Long story short, get it for 360, not Wii. Your Wii probably is already close to full as it is.
Pros:
<w:sdt sdtdocpart="t" docparttype="Bibliographies" docpartunique="t" id="658094550">Appearance: </w:sdt>[indent]<w:sdt sdtdocpart="t" docparttype="Bibliographies" docpartunique="t" id="658094550">Google chrome shines in its slick new look, it’s probably understandable why there’s already a Firefox theme out for it. Its efficient organization of space means more webpage and less browser which I like.</w:sdt>
<w:sdt sdtdocpart="t" docparttype="Bibliographies" docpartunique="t" id="658094550"></w:sdt>[/indent]<w:sdt sdtdocpart="t" docparttype="Bibliographies" docpartunique="t" id="658094550"> Speed: </w:sdt>[indent]<w:sdt sdtdocpart="t" docparttype="Bibliographies" docpartunique="t" id="658094550">Google chrome runs every tab in a separate process, and the resulting speed and stability is impressive. Pages load twice as fast as Firefox and a bazillion times faster than IE. Also if an add-in causes the browser to crash, you only loose that tab because is running in its own process. (Google)</w:sdt>
<w:sdt sdtdocpart="t" docparttype="Bibliographies" docpartunique="t" id="658094550"></w:sdt>[/indent]<w:sdt sdtdocpart="t" docparttype="Bibliographies" docpartunique="t" id="658094550"> Incognito mode: </w:sdt>[indent]<w:sdt sdtdocpart="t" docparttype="Bibliographies" docpartunique="t" id="658094550">There’s a new feature that allows for completely traceless surfing on the web. Upon activating this mode Chrome leaves no trace of the pages you’ve visited on your computer. (Google)</w:sdt>
<w:sdt sdtdocpart="t" docparttype="Bibliographies" docpartunique="t" id="658094550"></w:sdt>[/indent]<w:sdt sdtdocpart="t" docparttype="Bibliographies" docpartunique="t" id="658094550"> Quick and easy setup: </w:sdt>[indent]<w:sdt sdtdocpart="t" docparttype="Bibliographies" docpartunique="t" id="658094550">Setup was a breeze, and uninstalling took all but 3 seconds. Although I was a little upset win Google updater was installed as a startup service.</w:sdt>
<w:sdt sdtdocpart="t" docparttype="Bibliographies" docpartunique="t" id="658094550"></w:sdt>[/indent]<w:sdt sdtdocpart="t" docparttype="Bibliographies" docpartunique="t" id="658094550">
Cons: Confusing layout: </w:sdt>[indent]<w:sdt sdtdocpart="t" docparttype="Bibliographies" docpartunique="t" id="658094550">Google chromes simplified layout can be confusing at times. I found it difficult to find features I was looking for. In my opinion if you have to hunt more than 30 seconds for your bookmarks that’s too long.</w:sdt>
<w:sdt sdtdocpart="t" docparttype="Bibliographies" docpartunique="t" id="658094550"></w:sdt>[/indent]<w:sdt sdtdocpart="t" docparttype="Bibliographies" docpartunique="t" id="658094550"> Compatibility: </w:sdt>[indent]<w:sdt sdtdocpart="t" docparttype="Bibliographies" docpartunique="t" id="658094550">Google chrome has a new rendering engine which apparently has some issues. ‘Chrone doesn't works with Hotmail. Try to write a email and U can't see the tools. It's Suck.. I still Firefox 3 is better =D and Firefox is Netscape!’ (Views google.es on Google Chrome Google Chrome How To Use The New Google Chrome Browser).</w:sdt>
<w:sdt sdtdocpart="t" docparttype="Bibliographies" docpartunique="t" id="658094550"></w:sdt>[/indent]<w:sdt sdtdocpart="t" docparttype="Bibliographies" docpartunique="t" id="658094550"> Summary: In all I give Google chrome a 7.5 out of 10. For now I’m uninstalling it, and sticking with Firefox. I’ll give it another shot when it’s no longer in beta.
I certainly admit that I'm not very good at understanding economic issues, but even so, I don't quite see how doing nothing will help... "government is the problem, not the answer" is just something I completely disagree with. Government is sometimes a problem, but not always. And there doesn't seem to be much of an alternative to doing this... things are going to be really bad either way, but it'll be even worse without this deal. The record 777-plus (the number just keeps going up...) point DOW loss (and even worse losses in credit markets, evidently) is a sign of that.
Hopefully the bill will eventually pass, I think... it is an incredibly large amount of money at stake, but what alternative do we have?
Once he gets over griping over the "junction system and taking a fit over having to draw magic constantly out of monsters which to me is an exaggeration of what the game really is like , Skip over part2 I think?Its pure gold after that.
I got to admit , He points out things I didn't even notice myself, FF8 was a bit more tedious then most FF games that followed.
I liked FF8 , That being said I never really got deep into FF7 and it had allot to do with the fact I got into the PSX when it was already on its last leg with the Next generation consoles at the door. What turned me off from trying FF7 was the fact it was a pre dual shock game, During the year 2000 there was talk of making a "remasterd" FFVII with Ps2 era graphics so I thought I would wait for that to come out unfortunately square ditched the idea later on :shake: and has produced bullshit spin off PSP games instead .
The unique thing about FFVIII that spoony overlooks is that its the last time they created characters named Biggs & Wedge in their games, Whose names were lifted from the starwars rogue squadron pilots.B&W were the villains bumbling henchmen but in a Oscar and felix comical fashion.
While they continue making new incarnations of Cid ,The tradition of creating minor characters named Wedge and Biggs has been dropped.
FFVIII I found to be the most challenging and lengthy of the series, It has a much higher learning curve which is why some were frustrated with it.
As for the "devil" in a bottle , Yeah I did fall for that trap and had to reload the game as you only get one try at beating "diablo" and making him a GF, I used the same technique he did.
My favorite was FFIX, It didn't take itself so seriously like all the new games they make now, It was simple and uncomplicated,Very old school in its art style and gameplay with attempted to emulate the old 2d Snes games.
