16th June 2003, 1:36 PM
Quote:How can the game not look good for a first party game (when first party games aren't even the prettiest on the system all the time) and still say that because the effects were difficult, they get extra credit in terms of how good they look?
Rogue Squadron II, Metroid Prime, StarFox Adventures. All of those games look prettier than anything Nintendo has shown yet. Now answer my first question and don't dodge it again. Your calling me a troll won't mask the fact that you don't answer when it's not going to suit your point of view.
Calling me a troll doesn't make it so, either.
Alright here it is one more time, so pay close attention. Having to constantly repeat myself is getting really annoying.
Nintendo's first-party games aren't usually the most graphically impressive for their time, but they're always up there. Their later NES games were some of the best-looking titles for the system, and the same goes for their SNES and N64 games. But so far the Gamecube hasn't gotten quite the same treatment. Aside from Wind Waker, most of their first-party games don't look as good as they should/could/whatever. OVERALL, Mario Sunshine doesn't look anywhere near as good as their best-looking first-party game (WW), but it does have some great visuals in some places.