6th November 2017, 6:57 AM
What form of ranked choice was your state considering? Would it be a pure "this person is my first, this person is my second" system, or a system where each voter gets as many votes as there are candidates and gets to divide them up across the candidates as they so choose, including putting all the votes on a single candidate? Either way would be a marked improvement over "winner take all".
I'm glad you're with us on the two party system being flawed though. Again, I don't want parties themselves to die, just for the two-party deadlock our country has to die. If a change in the voter rules leads to that outcome, I'm satisfied.
I'm glad you're with us on the two party system being flawed though. Again, I don't want parties themselves to die, just for the two-party deadlock our country has to die. If a change in the voter rules leads to that outcome, I'm satisfied.
"On two occasions, I have been asked [by members of Parliament], 'Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question." ~ Charles Babbage (1791-1871)