13th July 2010, 4:11 PM
All that matters is evidence to back up the idea. Do you have it?
Absence of proof is not proof of absence. And you know it.
I don't have absolute knowledge nor do I claim to, but my "guess" is better than your's.
Lol....? What makes it better?
You'd do better to make rational arguments backed by evidence than just attacking me.
How can I make rational arguments about a hypothetical quasi-science?
Absence of proof is not proof of absence. And you know it.
I don't have absolute knowledge nor do I claim to, but my "guess" is better than your's.
Lol....? What makes it better?
You'd do better to make rational arguments backed by evidence than just attacking me.
How can I make rational arguments about a hypothetical quasi-science?
H.R.M. DARVNIVS MAXIMVS EX TENEBRIS EXIT REX DEVSQVE GORONORVMQVE TENDORVM ROMANORVM ET GRÆCORVM OMNIS SEMPER EST