10th June 2003, 8:49 PM
You know, there are two particular sides in this debate.
One side claims homosexuality is possible in anyone. They claim that to participate in the homosexual lifestyle is a choice and is not forced upon them by biology or genetic makeup. This side has shown conclusive proof standing for their statements.
The other claims homosexuality is an unavoidable force that certain people simply cannot escape and swear that nobody would ever choose. This particular side chooses not to check their belief against fact and has been consistently disproven in this drawn out argument.
Anyway, the latter claims that no one can choose to be straight if they're 'born' gay. The former counters with the fact of homosexuality in prisons, and how it's very existence is invincible proof of homosexuality being a choice. Suddenly, the latter claim homosexuality is no longer sexuality at all, now it's merely a state of mind.
That was exactly the result I expected when I brought this thread back. I expected the losers of the argument to suddenly redefine homosexuality in order to salvage their stance, rather than suck it up and concede defeat.
The point of this thread was to determine whether homosexuality was a choice or not. Since it has been proven beyond doubt that it is a choice, I don't feel there's any need to continue, because the point has been made and in six pages there has been no proof to refute it.
One side claims homosexuality is possible in anyone. They claim that to participate in the homosexual lifestyle is a choice and is not forced upon them by biology or genetic makeup. This side has shown conclusive proof standing for their statements.
The other claims homosexuality is an unavoidable force that certain people simply cannot escape and swear that nobody would ever choose. This particular side chooses not to check their belief against fact and has been consistently disproven in this drawn out argument.
Anyway, the latter claims that no one can choose to be straight if they're 'born' gay. The former counters with the fact of homosexuality in prisons, and how it's very existence is invincible proof of homosexuality being a choice. Suddenly, the latter claim homosexuality is no longer sexuality at all, now it's merely a state of mind.
That was exactly the result I expected when I brought this thread back. I expected the losers of the argument to suddenly redefine homosexuality in order to salvage their stance, rather than suck it up and concede defeat.
The point of this thread was to determine whether homosexuality was a choice or not. Since it has been proven beyond doubt that it is a choice, I don't feel there's any need to continue, because the point has been made and in six pages there has been no proof to refute it.
YOU CANNOT HIDE FOREVER
WE STAND AT THE DOOR
WE STAND AT THE DOOR