24th March 2003, 12:42 PM
Look. Doom with better graphics? Yeah... and that is exactly what they are trying to do...
How should games be rated? Based on graphics? Gameplay? Fun? Probably gameplay and fun... but those are so subjective that its impossible to be objective in things like this... but still. I just don't see how you hate Serious Sam so much that you actually think its a awful game! Disliking it I can see... but here's a question: What score would you give it? I don't know what I'd give it... they are fun games (yes, IMO they are fun), but very simple. Probably a 8.something, I don't know... not GOTY like Serious Sam got in 2001 from Gamespot, but a quality game...
Oh, and there is no Serious Sam 2 yet... its still in development. There is Serious Sam and Serious Sam part 2... which isn't a true sequel, just 'more of the same in new environments'.
How should games be rated? Based on graphics? Gameplay? Fun? Probably gameplay and fun... but those are so subjective that its impossible to be objective in things like this... but still. I just don't see how you hate Serious Sam so much that you actually think its a awful game! Disliking it I can see... but here's a question: What score would you give it? I don't know what I'd give it... they are fun games (yes, IMO they are fun), but very simple. Probably a 8.something, I don't know... not GOTY like Serious Sam got in 2001 from Gamespot, but a quality game...
Oh, and there is no Serious Sam 2 yet... its still in development. There is Serious Sam and Serious Sam part 2... which isn't a true sequel, just 'more of the same in new environments'.