8th April 2003, 5:57 AM
Quote:Originally posted by A Black Falcon
Oh, and I very much doubt that France, Russia, and Germany have their contracts as primary reasons to not want to go to war... its just not about that...
How can you possibly say that the United States is only in this war for oil and revenge, and then say that France is not trying to protect it's cashcow? When did you become a French citizen? How do you know that we're just in it for the money, yet they're noble people who's money is the last thing on their minds?
Not too bright, are you?
Quote:its about not seeing any good reason to fight and not changing that opinion when the US completely fails to provide any semblance of proof or reason to go to war...
Are you insane? Have you watched Colin Powell's address to the UN security council? Have you watched any of the news on TV? Whether or not Iraq has chemical weapons (which he does) is a mute point. The very SCUDS he's fired into Kuwait are in serious violation of UN resolution 1441, which was <B>UNANIMOUSLY</B> supported by the security council. That fact alone would be enough to justify military action.
Quote:oh, and doing what your people want (no war) in an attempt to win the next election, too.
See, your liberal ideals are warping your reality. Bush is a good and moral man, who would do the right thing, and fight for both our freedom and the freedom of the Iraqi people whether it was going to get him re-elected or not. BECAUSE IT IS THE RIGHT THING, not because he only cares about re-election!!! It's called having morals, and Tony Blair also has morals. He was standing with the US, despite falling polls in Brittain (which have since turned around).
You have demonstrated yourself to have no moral compass. You believe in nothing worth fighting for, and wouldn't fight for anything worthwhile if your friends thought you shouldn't. You live a very sad life.