30th March 2003, 1:06 PM
First off, I don't think this sentiment reflects ALL the anti-war people. You know, when demonstrating for peace, let's not suggest acts of violence, or do them. However, it seems these people probably actually were HAPPY to hear about that one soldier who bombed his commander's tent. It's rather sickening, and kinda a statement about humanity, that even when trying to get a message for peace and not war out, they have to suggest violence to do it. Stupid violent little humans...even in peace they wish for death to their enemies... *becomes a swirly eel covered demon pig*
Second off, yes regarding that war on... name of place I forget, which had all the problems that this current war seems to have (lack of UN support and such). It does seem ironic that one might support one and chastice the other. I must say I myself agreed with that war, and still do. Motivation was under question there too (something about taking attention away from his own situation). To be honest, I do believe I'll stop arguing about motivation. That's irrelevent. Are the actions, regardless of what motivated them, something that should be done here (or then)?
Second off, yes regarding that war on... name of place I forget, which had all the problems that this current war seems to have (lack of UN support and such). It does seem ironic that one might support one and chastice the other. I must say I myself agreed with that war, and still do. Motivation was under question there too (something about taking attention away from his own situation). To be honest, I do believe I'll stop arguing about motivation. That's irrelevent. Are the actions, regardless of what motivated them, something that should be done here (or then)?
"On two occasions, I have been asked [by members of Parliament], 'Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question." ~ Charles Babbage (1791-1871)