8th May 2004, 9:47 AM
No they are not. You said yourself, two posts ago, "'I'm just going to say that there is two roles for every action. The one who initiated it, and the effect of the initiation. Each has their own role." By that statement, and by your previous statements, the hypothetical cat is partially to blame for being beaten to death. You are right, there are endless scenarios I could put forth to prove my point... because the idea that the victim always deserves a share of the blame when he is wronged is patently easy to disprove.
YOU CANNOT HIDE FOREVER
WE STAND AT THE DOOR
WE STAND AT THE DOOR