4th February 2004, 1:04 PM
Me? You still think I meant something I didn't after I clearly explained it five times? Who's stupid now?
Now... let us go over this again. I post a link. People start talking about it. You make a few comments. I ask if you read it because your comment was a bit off. You say you did not. I say you should because you'd then be accurate while you were not. You make a joke. Then I post the article, not in response to the joke (which I never responded to directly because what would be the point? Its a joke...), but in response to your statement that you didn't read it. You say you still won't read it. So I say that you are stupid for not reading it when if you did you would be able to more effectively present your opinion ("arguement"). You go off on some bizarre tangent about my definition of "arguement" and some stupid thing about me replying to the joke with the statement about your points... I don't get you at all, but I think that's because you weren't exactly paying attention to what I was saying. Go back and read it, as I said, your "arguements" (here meaning the conventional meaning) got more and more pitiful...
Would you like me to respond to said joke though? Okay, I will... funny. And it does present a legitimate point... copying Sony might bring them to a place they don't want to be...
Quote:ar·gu·ment ( P ) Pronunciation Key (ärgy-mnt)
n.
1.
a. A discussion in which disagreement is expressed; a debate.
b. A quarrel; a dispute.
c. Archaic. A reason or matter for dispute or contention: “sheath'd their swords for lack of argument” (Shakespeare).
2.
a. A course of reasoning aimed at demonstrating truth or falsehood: presented a careful argument for extraterrestrial life.
b. A fact or statement put forth as proof or evidence; a reason: The current low mortgage rates are an argument for buying a house now.
c. A set of statements in which one follows logically as a conclusion from the others.
3.
a. A summary or short statement of the plot or subject of a literary work.
b. A topic; a subject: “You and love are still my argument” (Shakespeare).
4. Logic. The minor premise in a syllogism.
5. Mathematics.
a. The independent variable of a function.
b. The angle of a complex number measured from the positive horizontal axis.
6. Computer Science. A value used to evaluate a procedure or subroutine.
7. Linguistics. In generative grammar, any of various positions occupied by a noun phrase in a sentence.
Now... let us go over this again. I post a link. People start talking about it. You make a few comments. I ask if you read it because your comment was a bit off. You say you did not. I say you should because you'd then be accurate while you were not. You make a joke. Then I post the article, not in response to the joke (which I never responded to directly because what would be the point? Its a joke...), but in response to your statement that you didn't read it. You say you still won't read it. So I say that you are stupid for not reading it when if you did you would be able to more effectively present your opinion ("arguement"). You go off on some bizarre tangent about my definition of "arguement" and some stupid thing about me replying to the joke with the statement about your points... I don't get you at all, but I think that's because you weren't exactly paying attention to what I was saying. Go back and read it, as I said, your "arguements" (here meaning the conventional meaning) got more and more pitiful...
Would you like me to respond to said joke though? Okay, I will... funny. And it does present a legitimate point... copying Sony might bring them to a place they don't want to be...