7th September 2003, 6:21 PM
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/09/07/magazi...ed=1&8hpib
Now I know none of you will read it, given that it both requires you to get a (free, but that's not good enough for you) subscription to the NY Times website and then read this quite lengthy article (and within the next few weeks, because after a while NYT articles go off the free site)... but still, I wish someone would. Because its quite good... covers in depth just about all the topics that are relevant to the subject. I don't completely agree, but its still a interesting read...
Now I know none of you will read it, given that it both requires you to get a (free, but that's not good enough for you) subscription to the NY Times website and then read this quite lengthy article (and within the next few weeks, because after a while NYT articles go off the free site)... but still, I wish someone would. Because its quite good... covers in depth just about all the topics that are relevant to the subject. I don't completely agree, but its still a interesting read...