1st October 2003, 7:53 PM
Most of you will recognize that acronym, but notice it's not quite right. That's because instead of Rumbler of the Month, I suggest we establish Arguer of the Month. Just think of what this would do:
<ol>
<li>Now OB1 and ABF could argue more</li>
<li>We could keep track of who really does make the best points and who dodges the questions.</li>
<li>Each month, we could award one poster with the coveted AOTM title, which would lead to incessant bragging!</li>
<li>There would be a worthwhile reason to actually read through the many "discussions".</li>
</ol>
I'm sure there are plenty of other great benefits too. We just need to establish a couple judges, and we are ready to go.
And I'm only being partially sarcastic. It would be funny.
<ol>
<li>Now OB1 and ABF could argue more</li>
<li>We could keep track of who really does make the best points and who dodges the questions.</li>
<li>Each month, we could award one poster with the coveted AOTM title, which would lead to incessant bragging!</li>
<li>There would be a worthwhile reason to actually read through the many "discussions".</li>
</ol>
I'm sure there are plenty of other great benefits too. We just need to establish a couple judges, and we are ready to go.
And I'm only being partially sarcastic. It would be funny.