27th February 2020, 11:30 AM
That last debate was a mess wasn't it? All the candidates that were behind got the memo that they need to start interjecting more, but the problem is they ALL did that, and the moderators didn't know what they were doing or they would have kept the responses going in an orderly fasion.
Sanders got called out for a bad vote on gun control. He admitted he was wrong and pointed out the numerous times since then he's voted for tighter gun regulation. Beyond that, what was going on with the audience? I guess when NBC charges that crazy price you get a certain kind of audience. Any criticism at Bloomberg whatsoever, whether it was Biden or Warren or Sanders, was met with boos, and the weird claim by Bloomberg he "won" the last debate was met with cheers. Yeah, it's suspicious because those people didn't act like you would expect people to act.
Oh well, somehow Sanders got through that looking more favorable than any other candidate, so now all that remains is for Biden to win SC. No funny business there, it's just his firewall. I doubt it'll swing the election his way, and I still expect Sanders to come in a strong second, but yes, it was a forgone conclusion that SC was going to go to Biden. Older and more conservative black people dominate there.
Now the New York Times is reporting that the party seems to intend to swing the election some other way if Sanders wins but doesn't get the majority, and Warren well... I have NO idea what she's thinking lately. Frankly I was favoring her for years, but in the past couple of months I've had to swing to Sanders over a number of things, and these dishonest claims like that Sanders loved Superdelegates back in 2016... well there's direct video showing the opposite. What's she thinking? I'm starting to not even want her as Sander's VP pick the way she's going. That's what she gets for hiring Obama staffers. She's getting some very bad advice, for a progressive candidate that is.
Sanders got called out for a bad vote on gun control. He admitted he was wrong and pointed out the numerous times since then he's voted for tighter gun regulation. Beyond that, what was going on with the audience? I guess when NBC charges that crazy price you get a certain kind of audience. Any criticism at Bloomberg whatsoever, whether it was Biden or Warren or Sanders, was met with boos, and the weird claim by Bloomberg he "won" the last debate was met with cheers. Yeah, it's suspicious because those people didn't act like you would expect people to act.
Oh well, somehow Sanders got through that looking more favorable than any other candidate, so now all that remains is for Biden to win SC. No funny business there, it's just his firewall. I doubt it'll swing the election his way, and I still expect Sanders to come in a strong second, but yes, it was a forgone conclusion that SC was going to go to Biden. Older and more conservative black people dominate there.
Now the New York Times is reporting that the party seems to intend to swing the election some other way if Sanders wins but doesn't get the majority, and Warren well... I have NO idea what she's thinking lately. Frankly I was favoring her for years, but in the past couple of months I've had to swing to Sanders over a number of things, and these dishonest claims like that Sanders loved Superdelegates back in 2016... well there's direct video showing the opposite. What's she thinking? I'm starting to not even want her as Sander's VP pick the way she's going. That's what she gets for hiring Obama staffers. She's getting some very bad advice, for a progressive candidate that is.
"On two occasions, I have been asked [by members of Parliament], 'Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question." ~ Charles Babbage (1791-1871)