13th July 2010, 5:41 PM
Yeah, and zero privacy, and corporate policies that only very, very thinly try to disguise that fact.
What, you really don't find it at all suspicious?
I mean, yes, it was probably an accident. But it sure is convenient...
Dark Jaguar Wrote:There ya go thinking the worst without due cause again. I know of more than enough instances of this sort of thing that it being an accident is very probable. It's the natural result of "reply all" doing a "CC" by default instead of "BCC". Some ignorant spokeperson not knowing the difference doesn't seem far off. I mean, how often do people mass-email the ESRB anyway?
I'm sure you can say there's some sort of motive, and you could even make the motive convincing. The problem is, while hindsight is 20/20, it doesn't benefit anyone in the past. Motive alone isn't solid evidence, whatever benefit you may imagine for them.
What, you really don't find it at all suspicious?
I mean, yes, it was probably an accident. But it sure is convenient...