8th December 2007, 3:16 AM
alien space marine Wrote:If circumcision cannot be undone ; Its likely this involuntary neutering wont either. Unless your talking about China and India other overpopulated places I really don't think it will do much good except to violate human rights and be totally diabolic.
I am so turn off neutering ; I refused to get my dog fixed.(well he was a rare breed)
If anybody needs neutering its DJ
Reread it! I said VOLUNTARY! Also, medical procedures are generally unrelated to each other. I specifically said it shouldn't be a government mandate, but an elective procedure. I simply want to do the proper social engineering to where it's just what most parents choose to do, and they would have good reason to. What could possibly be the downside of THAT? If it is reversible, and there are a lot of possible methods to do this that could work for that (and of course it being reversible is necessary from the start or this plan won't work) then the idea is people will NEVER get pregnant unless they actually WANT to, because they have to turn that feature of themselves on to do so. Seriously it's like you WANT everything to just stay exactly as it is now.
"On two occasions, I have been asked [by members of Parliament], 'Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question." ~ Charles Babbage (1791-1871)