20th March 2007, 11:04 PM
My stance on climate change is not one of denial, the more I research it, but it's pretty undeniable that a man like Gore has a political agenda a mile long behind his overblown disaster flick, a movie which showcases all of the worst possible scenarios and paints them as not only likely, but completely our fault. Which is nonsense. We are a factor, but we're not the only factor, and I don't even believe we're a very major one, and the left-wing nutcases like Gore only really hurt efforts to help by making this such a political issue, and a consipiracy theory to boot; the evil capitalists are really Captain Planet villains who want to destroy the world!!!!! Because a dead world is worth money or something, I guess. I can think of no other way such a stance makes sense.
Oh yeah, it's also well known that Gore uses a Lear Jet for ferrying purposes, and there really aren't many vehicles on earth that are less fuel-efficient. Total hypocrite.
Oh yeah, it's also well known that Gore uses a Lear Jet for ferrying purposes, and there really aren't many vehicles on earth that are less fuel-efficient. Total hypocrite.
YOU CANNOT HIDE FOREVER
WE STAND AT THE DOOR
WE STAND AT THE DOOR