11th March 2004, 2:24 PM
Um, but that wouldn't obey occam's razor would it?
Simplest explanation is the correct one!
LTTP was ANNOUNCED to be before Zelda 1, a history of a previous unrelated Link. That's why it's called Link to the PAST you see. OOT is obviously the imprisoning war. No other explanation works, but that one fits perfectly, almost like it was planned that way, which it was (there's a reason the translation for LTTP for GBA finally used sages rather than wise men). Zelda 2's storyline uses Zelda 1's Link, and it's stated many times in the storyline and is a very important plot point. Aside from LA, everything fits perfectly ONLY in one way. Ya gotta admit that.
Simplest explanation is the correct one!
LTTP was ANNOUNCED to be before Zelda 1, a history of a previous unrelated Link. That's why it's called Link to the PAST you see. OOT is obviously the imprisoning war. No other explanation works, but that one fits perfectly, almost like it was planned that way, which it was (there's a reason the translation for LTTP for GBA finally used sages rather than wise men). Zelda 2's storyline uses Zelda 1's Link, and it's stated many times in the storyline and is a very important plot point. Aside from LA, everything fits perfectly ONLY in one way. Ya gotta admit that.
"On two occasions, I have been asked [by members of Parliament], 'Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question." ~ Charles Babbage (1791-1871)