30th January 2003, 3:29 PM
They don't consistently rate games strangely for bizarre reasons like IGN does... I read their reviews, but don't put a whole lot of crediblility on them compared to how I think... sure, they are decent reviews (the PC ones are overall decent... the N64/NGC ones though are definitely below average...) but still I think the they take off points for no good reason, or give odd scores, way too much for me to give them much credibility.
Just look at all the games marked down significantly for nearly nonexistant framerate problems. Or Skies of Arcadia here, with its bizzare 5 in graphics...
No, even in the PC division (better than the NGC one for sure), the reviews don't match Gamespot's in good scoring or accuracy. Are they decent? Usually... but not enough for me to find them really all that good...
Just look at all the games marked down significantly for nearly nonexistant framerate problems. Or Skies of Arcadia here, with its bizzare 5 in graphics...
No, even in the PC division (better than the NGC one for sure), the reviews don't match Gamespot's in good scoring or accuracy. Are they decent? Usually... but not enough for me to find them really all that good...