3rd February 2003, 2:53 AM
Nah, reselling doesn't require a liscensing fee. You know how lots of food products have a big "not for resale" stamp on them? That's to keep them from being sued if someone eats the can of used sliced beets some person bought and kept in the back seat of their car for 17 years and gets a bit ill. Now renting requires a liscensing fee, because that's constant revenue off something instead of a one time and then you have no more right to it deal.
"On two occasions, I have been asked [by members of Parliament], 'Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question." ~ Charles Babbage (1791-1871)