17th December 2005, 8:36 PM
Paco/ You have no idea what you're talking about. Sit down. No hardware on Earth is capable of 'better draw distance' or 'smoother animations' those have always been dictated by the developers and real time lighting isn't processor intensive, just time consuming in development. Watch the trailer for Kameo when it was running on GC, it looks exactly like the XBox version. You'll notice that in the GC trailer, the 'sea of orcs' scene is also there.
Do you even understand what HD is? If OB1 were here he would call you an idiot. Kameo on Revolution would look exactly the same in 480p as it would on 360 except the 360 would have higher resolutions on an HD television. If you removed the HD components of 360 you would need half or less than the system resources to run a 360 game. Half the system resources of 360 = Revolution. But most of all, it all comes down to how much a developer is willing to spend on the game in time and money. Thus the difference between something that looks like shit (everything on 360 right now except the Rare games and Donkey Kong World) and something that doesn't (The Rare games and Donkey Kong World). Madden 06 looks good, well, it looks okay. But it plays like ass, even the developer said "sorry, we spent all our time on graphics" and it shows. Good developers make the game pretty, not the system, the system is just a pile of resources and those resources (save for HD) are basically 2 to 3 times the power of XBox... which is a Revolution ("Basically 2 to 3 times more powerful than GC" which, in your own words, are 'on par' with XBox and in some cases even better).
Yeah Zelda TP and RE4 are no match for Halo. Fuck even Pikmin 2 looks better than most XBox games. Do you even play video games? Or do you just go around forums making wild statements to see a reaction? Reminds me of DJ telling people he's a girl. You even said in a different thread that RE4 is the most impressive game graphically (you sure as shit aint talkin about the PS2 version) and now you act as if it doesn't exist, or the Prime series, or WW and TP or REmake and RE0. TP I bet would look very similar on XBox if there were any programers that dev for it worth their salt (which there are not save Capcom and Rare who dont measure up to Nintendo's devs) to crank it out but it's well known that the XBox cant do the level of cel shading done in WW.
All systems have their strong points and weaknesses and it's up to developers to wrok around them. You cannot tell me that 360 games look vastly superior to the current gen XBox games because they dont, save for a handful of nice effects here and there. The reason they look like that is because it takes a system about 3 times more powerful than XBox to display current gen XBox games in full HD.
*tears open your ass and wears you like a suit* LOOK AT ME I'M PACO I BLINDLY DEFEND THE CONSOLE OF A FACELESS CORPORATION BECAUSE THEY MAKE MY DICK FEEL LONGER *YINYAP YINYAP YINYAP*
Quote:We really don't know if the Revolution could handle Kameo or not. Seeing as how the 360 made the HD output possible I'd say no, the Revolution is not capable of handling Kameo as it is right now.
Do you even understand what HD is? If OB1 were here he would call you an idiot. Kameo on Revolution would look exactly the same in 480p as it would on 360 except the 360 would have higher resolutions on an HD television. If you removed the HD components of 360 you would need half or less than the system resources to run a 360 game. Half the system resources of 360 = Revolution. But most of all, it all comes down to how much a developer is willing to spend on the game in time and money. Thus the difference between something that looks like shit (everything on 360 right now except the Rare games and Donkey Kong World) and something that doesn't (The Rare games and Donkey Kong World). Madden 06 looks good, well, it looks okay. But it plays like ass, even the developer said "sorry, we spent all our time on graphics" and it shows. Good developers make the game pretty, not the system, the system is just a pile of resources and those resources (save for HD) are basically 2 to 3 times the power of XBox... which is a Revolution ("Basically 2 to 3 times more powerful than GC" which, in your own words, are 'on par' with XBox and in some cases even better).
Quote:Which Gamecube game looked better than some of the best looking Xbox games? I'd say they are mostly on par, but better?
Yeah Zelda TP and RE4 are no match for Halo. Fuck even Pikmin 2 looks better than most XBox games. Do you even play video games? Or do you just go around forums making wild statements to see a reaction? Reminds me of DJ telling people he's a girl. You even said in a different thread that RE4 is the most impressive game graphically (you sure as shit aint talkin about the PS2 version) and now you act as if it doesn't exist, or the Prime series, or WW and TP or REmake and RE0. TP I bet would look very similar on XBox if there were any programers that dev for it worth their salt (which there are not save Capcom and Rare who dont measure up to Nintendo's devs) to crank it out but it's well known that the XBox cant do the level of cel shading done in WW.
All systems have their strong points and weaknesses and it's up to developers to wrok around them. You cannot tell me that 360 games look vastly superior to the current gen XBox games because they dont, save for a handful of nice effects here and there. The reason they look like that is because it takes a system about 3 times more powerful than XBox to display current gen XBox games in full HD.
*tears open your ass and wears you like a suit* LOOK AT ME I'M PACO I BLINDLY DEFEND THE CONSOLE OF A FACELESS CORPORATION BECAUSE THEY MAKE MY DICK FEEL LONGER *YINYAP YINYAP YINYAP*