2nd September 2005, 5:38 AM
If Red Cross or Salvation Army weren't sheltering and feeding refugees, someone else would. Their involvement is arbitrary. And if you are going to say "what!? no one else would, thats why they are needed."
If the Red Cross could not raise enough funding to support itself from donations, it probably wouldn't go under. It would appeal to the Government, who would then aid it or if it were to shut down, the Government would create a task force to fill the void. Either way the job is going to get done, and I don't have to care.
I didn't appreciate this comment either
If the Red Cross could not raise enough funding to support itself from donations, it probably wouldn't go under. It would appeal to the Government, who would then aid it or if it were to shut down, the Government would create a task force to fill the void. Either way the job is going to get done, and I don't have to care.
I didn't appreciate this comment either
Quote: It's a good thing not every feels that wayLet's try not to get personal, buddy *pushes GR harshly indicating that things could escalate quickly if GR were to keep up personal attacks*
.....oooO...............
.....(....)...Oooo.....
..........(....(....)....
........._).....)../.....
...............(_/.......
.........WAS..........
..I.......................
..................HERE.
.....(....)...Oooo.....
..........(....(....)....
........._).....)../.....
...............(_/.......
.........WAS..........
..I.......................
..................HERE.