1st September 2005, 10:38 PM
(This post was last modified: 1st September 2005, 11:05 PM by Dark Jaguar.)
I see, well the reality is I never checked into the issue and the last I heard, that she didn't have sufficient evidence, was last year.
So, I'll check into it myself and find out what the truth is. The first stop is the snopes message boards to get some sort of lead.
Okay, this is all I have so far. This only shows that this particular article was premature though. She didn't win at the time of that article, just get the right to continue with the case. In other words, it was not thrown out, but she has not won the case either.
As for the current state of that case, I still don't know.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/business/matrix.asp
So, I'll check into it myself and find out what the truth is. The first stop is the snopes message boards to get some sort of lead.
Okay, this is all I have so far. This only shows that this particular article was premature though. She didn't win at the time of that article, just get the right to continue with the case. In other words, it was not thrown out, but she has not won the case either.
As for the current state of that case, I still don't know.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/business/matrix.asp
"On two occasions, I have been asked [by members of Parliament], 'Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question." ~ Charles Babbage (1791-1871)