17th June 2005, 10:52 AM
Um, what does the music have to do with anything? Except in comedy situations, none of the characters actually hear any of the music, so it's not canonically there.
And ABF, I mean that if they don't get fried by being near all that lava, they should be able to withstand a direct hit by a lightsaber. I'm not talking about the heat radiating thing any more. I'm talking about being able to directly grab one.
I KNOW THAT THINGS DON'T ALWAYS HAVE TO BE REALISTIC! Yeesh... You are treating me like a child here. You act as though I've never thought that thought in my life... OF COURSE I agree with that! I was talking about how there is ALSO something to be said for realism in the sense that certain things can add to the whole feel of the movie, and realistic jumping physics WOULD be one of them. Why is it that when I talk about Star Wars it's so hard to actually HAVE a conversation with you without you completely ignoring everything I say or just out and out assuming I mean something I very clearly do not?
Yeesh, I'm not saying that all sci fi movies should ALWAYS obey the laws of physics. Why do you think I'm saying that? I'm saying that a lot of the stuff they do could be done in more realistic fasions and still be exciting, or in the case of the jumping thing, they could do something unrealistic in a way that appears a lot more natural. I DID explain it in a way that I thought made my viewpoint not only clear, but also artistically sound.
Look, it's just very annoying when I keep having to make my point clear. I've argued very similar things to you in the past. You should know what I mean by now.
And ABF, I mean that if they don't get fried by being near all that lava, they should be able to withstand a direct hit by a lightsaber. I'm not talking about the heat radiating thing any more. I'm talking about being able to directly grab one.
I KNOW THAT THINGS DON'T ALWAYS HAVE TO BE REALISTIC! Yeesh... You are treating me like a child here. You act as though I've never thought that thought in my life... OF COURSE I agree with that! I was talking about how there is ALSO something to be said for realism in the sense that certain things can add to the whole feel of the movie, and realistic jumping physics WOULD be one of them. Why is it that when I talk about Star Wars it's so hard to actually HAVE a conversation with you without you completely ignoring everything I say or just out and out assuming I mean something I very clearly do not?
Yeesh, I'm not saying that all sci fi movies should ALWAYS obey the laws of physics. Why do you think I'm saying that? I'm saying that a lot of the stuff they do could be done in more realistic fasions and still be exciting, or in the case of the jumping thing, they could do something unrealistic in a way that appears a lot more natural. I DID explain it in a way that I thought made my viewpoint not only clear, but also artistically sound.
Look, it's just very annoying when I keep having to make my point clear. I've argued very similar things to you in the past. You should know what I mean by now.
"On two occasions, I have been asked [by members of Parliament], 'Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question." ~ Charles Babbage (1791-1871)