30th April 2005, 3:34 PM
Considering his whole argument is that Voyager is good, your counter that he LIKES Voyager isn't exactly a good point. Wouldn't it FOLLOW that he'd like it if it was in fact good? It's not proof, but it hardly refutes his entire argument. Such statement really don't have any validity. The argument that someone works for NASA is hardly a way to prove that their opinion that what NASA has just discovered, and that person is stating, must be wrong, or that they must be ignored because they are "biased". Bias aside, if they have evidence then it doesn't matter, and if they have evidence showing something to be the case then of COURSE they will be biased towards it. Perhaps I misunderstood though...
As for me, I liked it. Sure it's not very original, but when you consider that TNG just went on and on and ripped itself off... well I'm not sure where I'm going with this but... I did like the series.
As for me, I liked it. Sure it's not very original, but when you consider that TNG just went on and on and ripped itself off... well I'm not sure where I'm going with this but... I did like the series.
"On two occasions, I have been asked [by members of Parliament], 'Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question." ~ Charles Babbage (1791-1871)