25th April 2005, 3:17 PM
Quote:That doesn't make any damn sense. Go back and read the past several posts.
Yeah, as usual you make a point, I recognize the valid parts of your point and say 'in addition to that this is a valid point too', and you insult me for not saying that you are 100%, exactly right in every possible way (including, most certainly, ways that your opponent in the debate didn't say!).
It's as stupid as it sounds.
Saying "you're right, as far as you go, but there's more to it than that" shouldn't be considered a threat that you must destroy, OB1, it should be considered a valid point that you should consider... maybe someday you'll be able to do that, but until then, anyone who voices the tiniest bit of objection to what you say (even if like here IT (the response to what you said) DOES NOT SAY THAT ANY OF THE POINTS YOU HAVE ACTUALLY MADE (the 'these are why it's more complex to make a 3d adventure game' points, I mean, in this case) ARE INVALID) gets dragged over the coals...
Really, if I have such a little understanding of what your point is, why have I demonstrated that I understand it, and why have I shown quite clearly that I understand at least 80% of your points quite well, and why is it that what I am saying is an arguement made based on the fact that I DO understand it? Right, because I DO understand it.