25th April 2005, 2:26 PM
Quote:So OoT is a worse game than Mario 64 because Mario 64 is more "fun"? I don't judge games like you do, obviously.
Huh? No, I think OoT is more fun than Mario 64... :)
Of course fun isn't the only factor. But it's definitely a very important one...
Quote:No, the game is not designed in "full 3D". I already explained that. Only the graphics engine is fully 3D. That's not the tough part.
It's obvious that they were thinking at least some in three dimensions based on their level design, though...
Quote:I said full three dimensions. Branching paths and slight z axis movement is NOT full 3D. Not in regards to this subject.
True, but it's more use of three dimensions than most sidescrollers use...
Quote:I have been arguing (and so have you), the difficulty in creating GGA versus MN. I'm glad you've finally admitted (in your ABF way) that you are wrong.
As for which is a better game, you're entitled to your opinion.
Actually, it started out as about which is the better game, but then you decided you'd rather talk about this, not that... I was trying to get things back on track. But if you don't want to, fine...